Cointelegraph•Monday, May 4, 2026 at 04:44 AM•1 min read
‘Stablecoins’ are an outdated term from crypto’s early years: a16z
The Signal TakeBullish
<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;"><img src="https://images.cointelegraph.com/images/528_aHR0cHM6Ly9wYXlsb2FkLmx1bS10cmkub3JnL2FwaS9hcnRpY2xlLWNvdmVycy9maWxlL1doYXQlMjBpcyUyMHRoZSUyMHJlYWwlMjBwb3RlbnRpYWwlMjBvZiUyMHN0YWJsZWNvaW4uanBnP3ByZWZpeD1tZWRpYSUyRmFydGljbGUtY292ZXJz.jpg" alt="‘Stablecoins’ are an outdated term from crypto’s early years: a16z" class="type:primaryImage"></p><p>John Palmer, a developer and brand adviser, said it "feels like a bug" to call them stablecoins and that they should have a self-defined and non-reactionary name. </p>
📱
Never miss a Web3 update
Join our Telegram channel to receive news in real-time, straight to your phone.
Related News
Could Chainlink Be a Retirement Millionaire Crypto? Its Oracle Network Now Secures $100 Billion in Value. - The Motley Fool
Apify/The Motley Fool•58m ago
BTC price can 'easily' hit $95K: Five things to know in Bitcoin this week
Cointelegraph•1h ago
Capital B raises $1.3M from Adam Back for Bitcoin strategy
Cointelegraph•2h ago
Crypto fight at center of FISA extension poised to escalate - The Hill
Apify/The Hill•2h ago